Skip to main content
Invoice-Converter.comInvoice-Converter
BlogPricing
Convert InvoiceConvert
Convert
⌘K
Documentation overview
Understand formats and standards
Compliance Guides
XRechnung Standard
ZUGFeRD Format
PDF/A-3 for ZUGFeRD
CII Cross Industry Invoice
UBL Universal Business Language
DIN EN 16931-1 Standard
PEPPOL Network
Country and regulatory rules
EU E-Invoicing Mandate
EU E-Invoicing
EU e-invoicing in 2026: what to implement (and why)
EU top markets playbook (DE, FR, IT, ES, PL, NL)
PEPPOL in the EU: how exchange actually works
CTC/clearance and portals in the EU: how to build reliable integrations
Country Guides
Germany
France
Italy
Spain
Poland
Netherlands
Belgium
Austria
Denmark
Sweden
Finland
Fix validation and submission issues
Leitweg-ID Validation
Support playbooks
Support
Why invoices need review
PDF readiness
Source data readiness
Attachments and service descriptions
API errors
API automation
Handling schema errors
Review validation help
Support
Missing information
Buyer reference
Payment and IBAN
VAT and reverse charge
Totals and rounding
Prepayments
Line items
ZUGFeRD PDF warnings
Validation playbooks
Observed validation fixes
Due date or terms
Bank transfer IBAN
PDF/A-3 readiness
VATEX exemption reason
Review vs download
Public test invoice fixture library
Valid XRechnung UBL basic invoice
Invalid XRechnung missing payment terms
Factur-X/ZUGFeRD EN 16931 CII XML
XRechnung rounding and IBAN edge case
KoSIT Validator Errors
ERROR
BR-DE-1
BR-DE-2
BR-DE-3
BR-DE-4
BR-DE-5
BR-DE-6
BR-DE-7
BR-DE-8
BR-DE-9
BR-DE-10
BR-DE-11
BR-DE-14
BR-DE-15
BR-DE-16
BR-CO-3
BR-CO-4
BR-CO-9
BR-CO-10
BR-CO-11
BR-CO-13
BR-CO-14
BR-CO-15
BR-CO-16
BR-CO-17
BR-CO-25
BR-CO-26
BR-S-1
BR-S-5
BR-S-8
BR-61
BR-AE-02
BR-AE-10
BR-E-01
BR-E-05
BR-DE-19
BR-05
BR-22
BR-23
BR-24
BR-25
BR-26
BR-47
BR-57
BR-DE-22
BR-DE-30
BR-DE-31
PEPPOL-EN16931-R001
PEPPOL-EN16931-R010
PEPPOL-EN16931-R020
PEPPOL-EN16931-R046
PEPPOL-EN16931-R120
PEPPOL-EN16931-R130
WARNING
BR-DE-17
BR-DE-18
BR-DE-20
BR-DE-21
BR-DE-26
BR-DE-27
BR-DE-28
Look up reference data
Glossary
E
EN 16931
E-reporting
e-Factura RO
EAS (Electronic Address Scheme)
ebInterface
C
CIUS
CII
Code list
Credit note
Contract reference
Chorus Pro
Codice Destinatario
X
XRechnung
XML Schema (XSD)
XML
Z
ZUGFeRD
F
Factur-X
Finvoice
U
UBL
Unit code
P
PEPPOL
PEPPOL BIS
Participant ID
PDF/A-3
Payment means
Purchase order (PO)
PDP (Plateforme de Dématérialisation Partenaire)
A
Access Point
Allowance / charge
S
SMP
SML
Schematron
SDI (Sistema di Interscambio)
Svefaktura
L
Leitweg-ID
K
KoSIT
KSeF
KvK number
V
Validation
VAT ID
ViDA
VeriFactu
ViDA Pillar 1: Digital Reporting Requirements
ViDA Pillar 2: Single VAT Registration
ViDA Pillar 3: Platform Economy
B
Business Term (BT)
Business Group (BG)
BIC
R
Reverse charge
Real-time reporting
Real-time invoice reporting (RTIR)
T
Tax category
TicketBAI
I
IBAN
Invoice type code
Invoice line item
ISO 6523
D
Document reference
D-U-N-S Number
Digipoort
Q
QR code payment
G
GLN (Global Location Number)
O
OVT-tunnus
OIOUBL
N
NemHandel
Code Lists
Currency codes (common)
Country codes (common)
VAT category codes
Payment means type codes
Unit of measure codes (common)
Invoice type codes (common in XRechnung)
XRechnung Fields
Invoice basics
BT-1
BT-2
BT-3
BT-5
BT-6
BT-7
BT-8
BT-10
BT-11
BT-12
BT-14
BT-15
BT-16
BT-17
BT-18
BT-19
BT-21
BT-22
BT-23
BT-24
BT-25
BT-26
Delivery and payment
BT-9
BT-13
BT-20
BT-59
BT-60
BT-61
BT-70
BT-71
BT-72
BT-73
BT-74
BT-75
BT-76
BT-77
BT-78
BT-79
BT-80
BT-81
BT-82
BT-83
BT-84
BT-85
BT-86
BT-87
BT-88
BT-89
BT-90
BT-91
Seller details
BT-27
BT-28
BT-29
BT-30
BT-31
BT-32
BT-33
BT-34
BT-35
BT-36
BT-37
BT-38
BT-39
BT-40
BT-41
BT-42
BT-43
BT-62
BT-63
BT-64
BT-65
BT-66
BT-67
BT-68
BT-69
Buyer details
BT-44
BT-45
BT-46
BT-47
BT-48
BT-49
BT-50
BT-51
BT-52
BT-53
BT-54
BT-55
BT-56
BT-57
BT-58
Discounts and charges
BT-92
BT-93
BT-94
BT-95
BT-96
BT-97
BT-98
BT-99
BT-100
BT-101
BT-102
BT-103
BT-104
BT-105
Taxes and totals
BT-106
BT-107
BT-108
BT-109
BT-110
BT-111
BT-112
BT-113
BT-114
BT-115
BT-116
BT-117
BT-118
BT-119
BT-120
BT-121
BT-122
BT-123
BT-124
BT-125
Line items
BT-126
BT-127
BT-128
BT-129
BT-130
BT-131
BT-132
BT-133
BT-134
BT-135
BT-136
BT-137
BT-138
BT-139
BT-140
BT-141
BT-142
BT-143
BT-144
BT-145
BT-146
BT-147
BT-148
BT-149
BT-150
BT-151
BT-152
BT-153
BT-154
BT-155
BT-156
BT-157
BT-158
BT-159
BT-160
BT-161
BT-162
BT-163
ZUGFeRD Profiles
MINIMUM
BASIC WL
BASIC
EN 16931
EXTENDED
Compare formats and tools
Comparisons
XRechnung vs ZUGFeRD
PDF24 Tools
sevDesk
Integrate and implement
Platform incident help
Support
Temporary unavailable
Missing result
Validation unavailable
Browser errors
Account and rate limits
Credits and subscriptions
Authoritative validation
ERP export validation guides
DATEV
Lexware
SAP Business One
Odoo
Microsoft Dynamics
Trust & Security
Developer API
  1. E-Invoicing Resources
  2. XRechnung Fields
  3. BT-81

Reference

Markdown export

BT-81 Payment means type code

The means, expressed as code, for how a payment is expected to be or has been settled. This field specifies the payment method using standardized UN/CEFACT codes (UNCL4461) to ensure consistent payment processing across different systems and jurisdictions.

Quick answerIn plain languageWhat you usually enter hereWhat goes wrong oftenExamples in contextValid ExamplesInvalid ExamplesRelated FieldsXML mapping and field factsXML ImplementationValidation RulesWhy the standard cares about this fieldFAQOfficial sources and tools

Quick answer#

The means, expressed as code, for how a payment is expected to be or has been settled. This field specifies the payment method using standardized UN/CEFACT codes (UNCL4461) to ensure consistent payment processing across different systems and jurisdictions.

Delivery and payment

Delivery dates, payment means, and the operational context around settlement.

Quick actions

Validate XMLConvert invoice

In plain language#

The means, expressed as code, for how a payment is expected to be or has been settled. This field specifies the payment method using standardized UN/CEFACT codes (UNCL4461) to ensure consistent payment processing across different systems and jurisdictions.

The means, expressed as code, for how a payment is expected to be or has been settled. This field specifies the payment method using standardized UN/CEFACT codes (UNCL4461) to ensure consistent payment processing across different systems and jurisdictions.

The payment means type code is essential for automated payment processing, enabling systems to understand how payments should be executed. It determines whether additional payment details like bank account information (BT-84) or card details are required. This standardization facilitates straight-through processing in banking systems and reduces manual intervention in payment workflows.

What you usually enter here#

Three-digit numeric code from UN/CEFACT code list UNCL4461

Typical valid values include: 30, 58, 59, 49

Optional according to EN 16931-1, but highly recommended for automated payment processing. When provided, it must use valid codes from UN/CEFACT code list UNCL4461. German banking regulations and SEPA requirements may influence the choice of payment method codes.

What goes wrong often#

Avoid values like: 001, BANK, TRANSFER, CC

Relevant rule codes: BR-49, BR-CL-16

Examples in context#

The payment means type code is essential for automated payment processing, enabling systems to understand how payments should be executed. It determines whether additional payment details like bank account information (BT-84) or card details are required. This standardization facilitates straight-through processing in banking systems and reduces manual intervention in payment workflows.

Optional according to EN 16931-1, but highly recommended for automated payment processing. When provided, it must use valid codes from UN/CEFACT code list UNCL4461. German banking regulations and SEPA requirements may influence the choice of payment method codes.

Valid Examples#

Use these points as the practical checks for this section.

  • 30
  • 58
  • 59
  • 49
  • 48
  • 10
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70

Invalid Examples#

Use these points as the practical checks for this section.

  • 001
  • BANK
  • TRANSFER
  • CC
  • SEPA
  • 999

Related Fields#

The payment means type code is essential for automated payment processing, enabling systems to understand how payments should be executed. It determines whether additional payment details like bank account information (BT-84) or card details are required. This standardization facilitates straight-through processing in banking systems and reduces manual intervention in payment workflows.

BT-82 Payment means text
BT-83 Remittance information
BT-84 Payment account identifier
BT-85 Payment account name
BT-86 Payment service provider identifier
BT-87 Payment card primary account number
BT-88 Payment card holder name
BT-89 Mandate reference identifier
BT-90 Bank assigned creditor identifier
BT-91 Debited account identifier

XML mapping and field facts#

Open the technical reference if you need XML paths, validator rule codes, legal wording, or schema-specific mapping details.

Field ID:

BT-81

Data Type:

code

Cardinality:

0..1

Requirement:

Optional

Max Length:

3 characters

Since Version:

Optional

XML Implementation#

UBL 2.1 Syntax
/Invoice/cac:PaymentMeans/cbc:PaymentMeansCode
CII (UN/CEFACT) Syntax
/CrossIndustryInvoice/SupplyChainTradeTransaction/ApplicableHeaderTradeSettlement/ram:SpecifiedTradeSettlementPaymentMeans/ram:TypeCode

Validation Rules#

BR-49

BR-49

BR-CL-16

BR-CL-16

Why the standard cares about this field#

Business Context

The payment means type code is essential for automated payment processing, enabling systems to understand how payments should be executed. It determines whether additional payment details like bank account information (BT-84) or card details are required. This standardization facilitates straight-through processing in banking systems and reduces manual intervention in payment workflows.

Legal Requirement

Optional according to EN 16931-1, but highly recommended for automated payment processing. When provided, it must use valid codes from UN/CEFACT code list UNCL4461. German banking regulations and SEPA requirements may influence the choice of payment method codes.

FAQ#

What are the most common payment means type codes in Germany?

The most common codes in German business are: 30 (Credit transfer/Bank transfer), 58 (SEPA credit transfer), 59 (SEPA direct debit), 49 (Direct debit), and 48 (Bank card/EC card). SEPA codes (58, 59) are preferred for Euro transactions within the SEPA area.

When should I use code 30 versus code 58?

Use code 58 (SEPA credit transfer) for Euro payments within the SEPA area, as it offers faster processing and lower costs. Use code 30 (Credit transfer) for international payments outside SEPA or non-Euro currencies. Code 58 typically requires only IBAN, while code 30 may require both IBAN and BIC.

Do I need to provide bank account details when using payment means codes?

It depends on the payment means code. Codes requiring account information include: 30, 58 (need IBAN, possibly BIC), 49, 59 (need account for direct debit). Codes like 10 (cash), 48 (card), 68 (online payment) typically don't require account details. Check the related fields BT-84 through BT-91 for specific account information requirements.

What is the difference between codes 49 and 59 for direct debit?

Code 49 (Direct debit) is for general direct debit transactions, including non-SEPA debits that may require BIC. Code 59 (SEPA direct debit) is specifically for Euro direct debits within the SEPA area, typically requiring only IBAN and offering standardized processing times and lower costs.

Can I use multiple payment means codes in one invoice?

Yes, XRechnung supports multiple payment means per invoice (cardinality allows multiple payment instruction groups). Each payment means can have its own code, account details, and amount allocation. This is useful for partial payments, multi-currency invoices, or offering payment alternatives.

How do German public authorities handle different payment means codes?

German public authorities typically prefer SEPA payment methods (codes 58 for credit transfer, 59 for direct debit) for efficient processing. Many authorities have automated systems that can process these codes for faster payment reconciliation. Some may restrict payment methods for security or administrative reasons - check specific authority requirements.

What happens if I use an invalid payment means code?

Invalid payment means codes will cause validation errors during XRechnung processing. The invoice may be rejected by the receiving system. Always use codes from the official UN/CEFACT UNCL4461 code list. Common mistakes include using descriptive text instead of numeric codes or using outdated codes.

Are there special considerations for B2B versus B2G payments?

B2G (Business-to-Government) payments often have stricter requirements and may prefer specific codes like 58 (SEPA credit transfer) for transparency and audit trails. B2B payments have more flexibility and may use various codes including 48 (cards), 68 (online payments), or 70 (mobile payments) depending on business relationships and agreements.

How does the payment means code affect settlement timing?

Different payment codes have varying settlement times: SEPA transfers (58) typically settle within 1 business day, direct debits (59) follow SEPA timelines, credit cards (48, 54) may settle within 1-3 days, while cash (10) settles immediately. Understanding these timings helps with cash flow planning and payment term setting.

Can I specify payment terms along with payment means codes?

Yes, payment means codes (BT-81) work together with payment terms (BT-20) and payment due date (BT-9). The payment means code specifies HOW to pay, while payment terms specify WHEN to pay and any conditions. For example, you can specify code 58 (SEPA transfer) with "Net 30 days" payment terms.

Official sources and tools#

KoSIT Validator
Invoice Converter
XRechnung Standard
Test Suite
BT-80BT-82
On this page
Quick answerIn plain languageWhat you usually enter hereWhat goes wrong oftenExamples in contextValid ExamplesInvalid ExamplesRelated FieldsXML mapping and field factsXML ImplementationValidation RulesWhy the standard cares about this fieldFAQOfficial sources and tools

Invoice-Converter.com

Helping businesses across Europe convert invoices to XRechnung and other e-invoice formats with validation support. Review edge cases before submission.

20,000+ invoices processed
Fast & Secure
Trusted by hundreds

Features

Convert PDFs & create

  • PDF to XRechnung
  • PDF to UBL
  • PDF to XRechnung (CII)
  • PDF to ZUGFeRD
  • PDF to Factur-X
  • Create XRechnung
  • XRechnung to PDF

View & validate

  • XRechnung/XML Viewer
  • XRechnung Validator

Quick Links

  • Resources
  • Trust & Security Center
  • Developer API Documentation
  • Blog
  • FAQ
  • Pricing
  • Climate Contribution

Legal

  • Imprint
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data Processing Agreement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Money-Back Guarantee

Get in Touch

contact@invoice-converter.com
Start Converting
© 2026 Invoice-Converter.com.Made with in Europe
GDPR Compliant
German Server